Highest Rated Events (only 193 and 304 shown) All AR FE FL

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-04T01:37:04

2014-12-24T16:50:23 --> 2014-12-24T17:30:23

Another possibly high-latitude jet. Its footpoint appears to be occulted.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-04T01:29:19

2014-12-24T11:50:23 --> 2014-12-24T12:50:23

This jet appears to have resulted from reconnection of small bipoles at the coronal base.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-04T01:16:20

2014-12-24T10:30:35 --> 2014-12-24T11:40:35

This eruption from the far side initially appeared like a jet, but as it hits the overlying coronal structures, it affected them including minor dimming. No CME associated.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-04T01:03:21

2014-12-24T02:20:24 --> 2014-12-24T04:20:24

The filament material that erupted appears to have mostly come back, hence a confined eruption. However, in GOES light curves, the C3.7 flare was followed by a long-decay event (around a C3 level), which concides with a post-eruption arcade including a cusp. The event was also seen as a narrow CME by LASCO.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-04T01:03:21

2014-12-24T02:20:24 --> 2014-12-24T04:20:24

The filament material that erupted appears to have mostly come back, hence a confined eruption. However, in GOES light curves, the C3.7 flare was followed by a long-decay event (around a C3 level), which concides with a post-eruption arcade including a cusp. The event was also seen as a narrow CME by LASCO.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-03T19:56:22

2014-12-24T01:35:23 --> 2014-12-24T02:01:23

The linear structure is reminiscent of a jet or surge, but this ejection seems to trace a closed loop structure.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-03T19:44:26

2014-12-23T23:30:35 --> 2014-12-24T01:16:35

Two jets are seen to come from different areas of AR 12241. The second one seems to be connected with a third one from the limb region, as was the case with the last event.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-03T19:37:41

2014-12-23T12:25:11 --> 2014-12-23T13:31:11

This event in AR 12241 seems to trigger another one closer to the limb.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-03T19:31:31

2014-12-23T10:50:23 --> 2014-12-23T11:30:23

This is an eruption probably from behind the limb. Coronal dimming is seen, but it is a failed eruption. Interestingly the loops around and over the dimming region are seen to oscillate, which may be related with confinement.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-03T19:16:35

2014-12-23T06:30:35 --> 2014-12-23T08:46:35

The C1.8 flare in AR 12241 looks dynamic, but it probably belongs to a confined eruption, and the filament that traces the main flare emission does not seem to erupt. Although the relationship is TBD, this flare was preceded by another C1.5 flare in AR 12242 (to southwest) and small prominence eruption on the southwest limb.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2015-01-03T19:16:35

2014-12-23T06:30:35 --> 2014-12-23T08:46:35

The C1.8 flare in AR 12241 looks dynamic, but it probably belongs to a confined eruption, and the filament that traces the main flare emission does not seem to erupt. Although the relationship is TBD, this flare was preceded by another C1.5 flare in AR 12242 (to southwest) and small prominence eruption on the southwest limb.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T17:46:10

2014-12-21T10:30:35 --> 2014-12-21T13:30:35

This is the last one in the series that left in-situ signatures at 1 AU even though the eruptive signatures in the low corona were not very outstanding. The M1.0 flare started in AR 12241. There was nearly a simultaneous eruption from AR 12244 (near the left edge of the movie). As in the previous examples, the main eruption with separating ribbons rooted by post-flare loops (in the encircled area) disturbed the neighboring south-to-southwest areas, including flaring in AR 12242.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T17:46:09

2014-12-21T10:30:35 --> 2014-12-21T13:30:35

This is the last one in the series that left in-situ signatures at 1 AU even though the eruptive signatures in the low corona were not very outstanding. The M1.0 flare started in AR 12241. There was nearly a simultaneous eruption from AR 12244 (near the left edge of the movie). As in the previous examples, the main eruption with separating ribbons rooted by post-flare loops (in the encircled area) disturbed the neighboring south-to-southwest areas, including flaring in AR 12242.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T17:46:09

2014-12-21T10:30:35 --> 2014-12-21T13:30:35

This is the last one in the series that left in-situ signatures at 1 AU even though the eruptive signatures in the low corona were not very outstanding. The M1.0 flare started in AR 12241. There was nearly a simultaneous eruption from AR 12244 (near the left edge of the movie). As in the previous examples, the main eruption with separating ribbons rooted by post-flare loops (in the encircled area) disturbed the neighboring south-to-southwest areas, including flaring in AR 12242.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T17:15:34

2014-12-20T00:00:03 --> 2014-12-20T01:30:03

This X1.8 flare was from AR 12242. Again, the eruption was noticed most clearly in the core region in the form of separating ribbons, between which bright post-flare loops formed. Without clear wave signatures, the southern areas were clearly affected, showing ribbon emission. After the CME was launched, the opening up of the loops seemed to cause a secondary eruption from the southern areas.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T17:15:33

2014-12-20T00:00:03 --> 2014-12-20T01:30:03

This X1.8 flare was from AR 12242. Again, the eruption was noticed most clearly in the core region in the form of separating ribbons, between which bright post-flare loops formed. Without clear wave signatures, the southern areas were clearly affected, showing ribbon emission. After the CME was launched, the opening up of the loops seemed to cause a secondary eruption from the southern areas.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T16:58:53

2014-12-18T21:00:35 --> 2014-12-18T23:30:35

This flare seems to be associated with a halo CME in LASCO C3 data on Dec 19, which is a natural candidate for the cause of the second IP signatures on Dec 21. The encircled area looks like a classical two-ribbon flare, but the eruption also affected a large area to the south. Interestingly, there was a filament eruption near the southeast limb just before this flare, but their possible connection is TBD. Without LASCO C2 data (still unavailable as of 24-Dec-2014 17 UT), it is hard to understand how this event is mapped into a halo CME.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T16:58:53

2014-12-18T21:00:35 --> 2014-12-18T23:30:35

This flare seems to be associated with a halo CME in LASCO C3 data on Dec 19, which is a natural candidate for the cause of the second IP signatures on Dec 21. The encircled area looks like a classical two-ribbon flare, but the eruption also affected a large area to the south. Interestingly, there was a filament eruption near the southeast limb just before this flare, but their possible connection is TBD. Without LASCO C2 data (still unavailable as of 24-Dec-2014 17 UT), it is hard to understand how this event is mapped into a halo CME.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T16:58:53

2014-12-18T21:00:35 --> 2014-12-18T23:30:35

This flare seems to be associated with a halo CME in LASCO C3 data on Dec 19, which is a natural candidate for the cause of the second IP signatures on Dec 21. The encircled area looks like a classical two-ribbon flare, but the eruption also affected a large area to the south. Interestingly, there was a filament eruption near the southeast limb just before this flare, but their possible connection is TBD. Without LASCO C2 data (still unavailable as of 24-Dec-2014 17 UT), it is hard to understand how this event is mapped into a halo CME.

Rating: 3.0 (0=lowest, 5=highest)         Num Ratings:1

Detected by halocme, Submitted at 2014-12-24T16:41:50

2014-12-17T04:00:03 --> 2014-12-17T06:00:03

This is the first of four events that did not look very eruptive when images were looked at casually but that nevertheless produced disturbances at 1 AU. In this flare the key to understanding this puzzle may be the extension of two-ribbon emissions.